Tuesday, October 2, 2012

A Fool for Christ


A pall lies over the church. Like a thick blanket of winter fog, spiritual coolness hovers above the people of God, freezing right to the bone.

Where is passion? Where is heat? Where are spiritual vigor and zeal? Who is there among the saints who is truly devoted, who has counted all things as loss that he may gain Christ? Who is there that has forsaken all to follow in the way of the cross: forsaken pleasures as well as sin, left behind earthly comforts and passing joys for superior and lasting glory of a heavenly sort?

I confess that I myself am not such a man. Always distractions on every side; always laziness presses in on my soul; always does hesitancy slow my steps and timidity hinder my path when I would run hard after my God! O Lord! May I not be the man choked by the concerns of the world and the desire for other things! Let me rather die today in flames of fervent love for you and others than live ten thousand days in this spiritual desolation!

O my people, my people! My brothers and my sisters bought by Majesty’s blood! Will we not together be done with lesser things and do all for Jesus, sparing not our comfort or our very lives? Awake! Arise! Let us tread this day the path He walked: after Golgotha waits Glory!

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Who were the Puritans?


Who were the Puritans? While I am no expert, I think this sums things up in essence:

“Puritan” is a word that is notoriously difficult to nail down in terms of whom it applies to and to whom it does not. In general, though, to be a Puritan meant to be part of that body of English believers and ministers (on both sides of the pond) who sought to “purify” the Church in the period of about 1560-1700, to bring it into greater conformity to the mind of Christ as revealed in Scripture. But this was more than merely an attempt at institutional reform. The Puritans were concerned that true Gospel holiness pervaded all spheres of life: church life, family life, community life and, of course, personal life. So great was their concern for holiness that they have come to us as having the reputation of being somewhat gloomy- killjoys we might say. But the truth is something different: the Puritans, for all of their “precision” in both doctrine and conduct, are examples of Gospel-centered joy and devotion, as anyone who has read their works can testify. Yes, they are rigorous and disciplined, but that cannot be confused with being rough and depressed. Rather, the Puritans should be considered as models of spiritual depth and maturity. In fact, spiritual maturity may be their greatest legacy. Hear J.I. Packer:

“What could these zealots [i.e. the Puritans] give us that we need, it is asked.
The answer, in one word, is maturity. Maturity is a compound of wisdom, goodwill, resilience, and creativity. The Puritans exemplified maturity; we don’t. We are spiritual dwarfs.”

There you have it: spiritual maturity displayed. That is the legacy of the Puritans to those who have eyes to see, and their great gift to us today. 

Let me, therefore, encourage you: Would you grow strong in Gospel-faith and deep in the true Christian religion? Read the Puritans. Insofar as mere men, with all their imperfections, may help us, these will do so. 

Reading with you,
aaron

Sunday, September 16, 2012

The Reason for Christ's Death


“…and he died for all, that those who live might no longer live for themselves but for him who for their sake died and was raised.” 2 Corinthians 5:15

Why did Christ die? What was God’s purpose in his bloody, awful crucifixion? For what reason was the Son of God crushed on the cross? Certainly the Christian may rejoice in that Christ died to secure the forgiveness of our sins and our reconciliation to the Godhead. No other fount we know to provide such cleansing and restoration. But here, Paul fixes our attention on something else that our Lord’s death accomplished. Namely, by virtue of his cross-work, Christ not only redirects the eternal destiny of every believer, but also radically transforms the believer’s daily focus. In what way? The essence is this: Christ’s death makes it possible that believers “might no longer live for themselves but for him.” That is, Christ’s death makes it possible for a saint to live for and be preoccupied with those things that concern Christ and his Kingdom. We may now be “done with lesser things,” as the old hymn teaches. Even further, not only does it make it possible for a Christian to live in this way, it makes it a certainty. For, we died with Christ and have “crucified the flesh with its passions and desires.”

What glorious liberation is this effect of the cross! How many pains are at root the results of a self-centered lifestyle? How many sins are in essence the bitter fruit of pursuing the kingdom of me rather than the Kingdom of I Am? But, thanks be to God, what a Savior we have who provides for us (and at so great a price it should be added) freedom from the vanity we are born to and toward which we tend!

So, may it be that today, Christian, you see clearly the connection between the death of your Lord and the death of your self, and may such awareness encourage you to live for him who for your sake died and was raised!

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Finished!

Today I finished reading Richard Baxter's The Reformed Pastor. Never have I read as incisive and as helpful a book as this on ministry. A bit like facing the surgeon's scalpel, only Baxter cuts deeper.

Here are five takeaways for me relative to pastoral ministry, without any elaboration whatsoever:

1. The necessity of caring for the WHOLE flock of god.
2. The diligence required for such care.
3. The means available for such care (particularly, personal instruction of all those in the church).
4. The dangers of avoiding such care.
5. The blessing of attending to such care.

Also, just to give you a little taste of Baxter's vision of a pastor's duty, here is a longer excerpt. He bases it all on Paul's discourse to the Ephesian elders found in Acts 20.

"O brethren! write it on you study doors- set it in capital letters as your copy, that it may be ever before your eyes. Could we but well learn two or three lines of it, what preachers should we be!

[a] Our general business- SERVING THE LORD WITH ALL HUMILITY OF MIND, AND WITH MANY TEARS.

[b] Our special work- TAKE HEED TO YOURSELVES AND TO ALL THE FLOCK.

[c] Our doctrine- REPENTANCE TOWARD GOD, AND FAITH TOWARD OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST.

[d] The place and manner of teaching- I HAVE TAUGHT YOU PUBLICLY, AND FROM HOUSE TO HOUSE.

[e] His diligence, earnestness, and affection- I CEASED NOT TO WARN EVERY ONE NIGHT AND DAY WITH TEARS. This is what must win souls, and preserve them.

[f] His faithfulness- I KEPT BACK NOTHING THAT WAS PROFITABLE UNTO YOU, AND HAVE NOT SHUNNED TO DECLARE UNTO YOU ALL THE COUNSEL OF GOD.

[g] His disinterestedness and self-denial for the sake of the gospel- I HAVE COVETED NO MAN'S SILVER OR GOLD OR APPAREL: YEA, THESE HANDS HAVE MINISTERED UNTO MY NECESSITIES, AND TO THEM THAT WERE WITH ME, REMEMBERING THE WORDS OF THE LORD JESUS, HOW HE SAID, IT IS MORE BLESSED TO GIVE THAN TO RECEIVE.

[h] His patience and perseverance- NONE OF THESE THINGS MOVE ME, NEITHER COUNT I MY LIFE DEAR UNTO ME, SO THAT I MIGHT FINISH MY COURSE WITH JOY, AND THE MINISTRY WHICH I HAVE RECEIVED OF THE LORD JESUS.

[i] His prayerfulness- I COMMEND YOU TO GOD AND TO THE WORD OF HIS GRACE, WHICH IS ABLE TO BUILD YOU UP, AND TO GIVE YOU AN INHERITANCE AMONG ALL THEM WHICH ARE SANCTIFIED.

[j] His purity of conscience- WHEREFORE I TAKE YOU TO RECORD THIS DAY, THAT I AM PURE FROM THE BLOOD OF ALL MEN."

Lord, give us such men as Baxter in our churches, and may I be such a one.

Sunday, September 9, 2012

On my "to read list"

This looks like an excellent resource for pastors- indeed for all Christians. From two men I respect greatly...

http://www.crossway.org/books/1-and-2-timothy-and-titus-hcj-1/

Friday, September 7, 2012

Note to self...

1 Timothy 1:5 "The aim of our charge is love that issues from a pure heart and a good conscience and a sincere faith."

What charge is Paul referring to here? Looking at verse 1:3, we see that it was the charge that "certain persons not teach any different doctrine" in the church, that is, doctrine that is outside of true Gospel orthodoxy. Thus, while some perceive the practice of guarding doctrine both divisive and pedantic, Paul saw it as the pathway to love and purity, to "a good conscience and a sincere faith."

Note to self then: doctrine and love are not incompatible.

The Pastor's Books

Some helpful words:

"The pastor’s work and the pastor’s books are inseparable. Since dialogue with scripture and tradition is so central to pastoral care, it is to be expected that the life of the pastor will be deeply enmeshed in the meditative reading, thoughtful study, and care of good books. Since the pastor’s time is limited, selection of excellent books is a consequential pastoral decision."

Oden, T. C. (1987). Becoming a Minister. Classic Pastoral Care (159). New York: Crossroad.

Monday, September 3, 2012

Interviewing the Apostle

One of the most helpful things for me in terms of studying a text in preparation for preaching is simply to ask questions of it. I liken it to "interviewing" the biblical author.

Thus, in preparation for preaching 1 Peter 2:9-10 in a couple months, here are some of the questions I'm asking Peter. The list is not exhaustive (and is in no particular order).


1.     Who is Peter addressing? Jewish Christians? Gentile Christians? Does it matter?
2.     What can I determine about the original recipients’ situation and how is it relevant to the meaning and exposition of the text?
3.     From what OT texts does Peter quote? Why does he use these quotes? How does he apply them? What were the original OT contexts and how does that influence the meaning of the quotes in 1 Peter?
4.     What is the meaning and purpose of 1 Peter as a whole?
5.     Why does Peter say the things he says at this particular point in the epistle? How does this section contribute to the meaning and purpose of 1 Peter as a whole?
6.     How does Peter’s identity and history influence his writing?
7.     What is the purpose of this particular text?
8.     Is there anything to learn from the Greek text that is not obvious in the English that I would have to explain?
9.     How is the Gospel present in this text?
10. How can I preach Christ clearly from this text?
11. How does the text “divide up” exegetically? Does it “divide up” differently homiletically?
12. How does this text apply to believers? To unbelievers? To UWSP students?
13. Are there other relevant biblical texts that shed light upon 1 Peter 2:9-10?
14. What is the tone of Peter’s epistle and of this section in particular? Encouraging? Rebuking? Instructing? Warning? Other?
15. How does the genre of 1 Peter (epistle) influence its meaning?
16. What are the main themes of 1 Peter as a whole?
17. Where does 1 Peter fit into the overarching biblical storyline?
18. What are some possible wrong interpretations and conclusions to be drawn from this text?

Sunday, September 2, 2012

A Great Pastor's Greatest Weakness

I was profoundly helped this evening by a quote from R.C. Sproul. It's his answer to the question "What is your greatest weakness as a pastor?" Both encouraging and convicting...

"My biggest weakness is that I am profoundly shy. I am not quick to make friends, nor even to interact with the friends I have been blessed with. Though I am confident in the depth of the love I have for the sheep under my care, I likewise understand why that love may not seem so evident to the sheep. My shyness is, I suspect, a corollary to a deeper problem, that I want to be liked. My reputation matters far more to me than it should."

Read the whole thing at http://www.ligonier.org/blog/10-important-things-ask-potential-pastor/

Saturday, September 1, 2012

Sermon outline draft

In October I will be doing one of my favorite things: speaking at the InterVarsity large group meeting at the University of Wisconsin Stevens Point, my alma mater.

I will be preaching on the theme of "belonging" from 1 Peter 2:9-10. Below is the first stage of my outline draft. Please pray for the time, that the saints would be built up and unbelievers called.

Purpose: to answer the question "Where do I belong?" from a biblical perspective.

Text: 1Peter 2:9-10

Thesis: God calls us in Christ to belong...

1. To Himself.
2. To His People.
3. To His Purpose.

Again, please pray!

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Follow-up on anxiety

Dr. Robert Kellemen, who is a wonderful teacher, posted recently this interview regarding his book on anxiety. Here is the link: http://www.rpmministries.org/2012/08/anxiety-anatomy-and-cure-2/

Here, too, is a fantastic excerpt: “Anxiety is vigilance out of control—hyper-vigilance, stuck vigilance. You scan…and scan…and scan your environment worried about the ‘what ifs’ of life. Anxiety is toxic scanning. Anxiety is also vigilance trying to maintain control in a self-protective and self-sufficient way. Anxiety is vigilance minus faith in God.”

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Anxiety and Ministry


Anxiety and depression in the ministry are real. I recall Alistair Begg saying once that his session on “Pastoral Depression” at a conference he spoke at was overwhelmingly attended, a fact that only hints at the serious and widespread nature of the issue. Without becoming unduly autobiographical myself, I have sensed over the years (increasingly so as I’ve moved more and more into ministry) that this will be an issue that I personally will need to wrestle through in the grace and strength of God for the sake of a fruitful ministry.

As part of that wrestling, here are a few brief thoughts on the matter that I find helpful.

1.     Relentlessly seek to identify the root of your anxiety.

The nature of anxiety is that it tends to be blinding. We feel as if we are in a fog and unable to discern what it is that is causing us to feel the way we feel. Often, there are a number of contributing factors to our worry, which only makes it harder to isolate the source. Isolate, however, we must. Without spinning ourselves in circles, we must attempt to pinpoint the leak in our joy that we may plug it with the promises of God. Hopefully, as time goes on, we will be able to move from saying, “I feel anxious,” to a more concrete expression of worry such as, “I fear I won’t be accepted by those I minister to,” or “I’m distressed regarding this choice I must make.”

2.     Courageously seek to communicate with others about your anxiety.

Again, the nature of anxiety is such that it tends to isolate us from others. A dear friend may be calling on the phone, but you feel unable to even begin to answer. A loved one may perceptively ask how you are, but a strange reluctance to articulate the truth resides upon your tongue. What are we to do in such situations? Silence can be deadly to our progress out of the valley, and so we must courageously confide in a trusted soul. A detailed explanation is unnecessary to begin- a brief statement will do: “I could use prayer for anxiety” or “I’m lacking in peace as of the moment.” From there, God will best direct the course of the conversation in order to bring the needed care.

3.     Ruthlessly seek to comfort yourself with the promises of God.

Finally, though we are grateful for the fellowship and encouragement of other believers, the ultimate source of our comfort must be our God, who “comforts the depressed,” is “near to the broken-hearted,” and who “a bruised reed he will not break.” Recollect that Christ, who has known untold sorrow, has offered- even guaranteed- to never leave you or forsake you. Remind yourself, even if in the moment it seems to do no good to you, that no depth of despair can separate you from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus. Let these and the other promises of God be the rain that waters your desert soul, refusing to obtain comfort from the world or the things of it. Surely our Adversary knows that when we are weak his enticements hold great allure, and so he will seek to tempt us in these moments. By faith, however, hold on the promises of the Faithful One.

Saturday, August 25, 2012

Following the Method of Christ

This is perhaps one of the most helpful quotes on preaching I know of, from one of the most helpful resource books I know of:

"Jesus' debates with the Pharisees, Sadducees, and the leaders of this nation were mainly concerned with the interpretation of the Bible. Their interpretations were wrong and as a result they did not believe in him.
Jesus not only told them that they were wrong, but on many occasions told them why they were wrong. He frequently prefaced his explanation of their error with the question 'Have you not read?' On one level this was simply a way of reminding them of the content  of Scripture, and of pointing out to them that the truth would be found in the Scripture. On another level the question, 'Have you not read?' challenged then to question their understanding of the meaning of Scripture. If they had read it carefully, and understood it as God intended, then they would believe in Jesus, not oppose him. Even his own disciples were 'foolish', and 'slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken'; Jesus had to open both their minds and the Scriptures for them to believe in him and understand the OT [Old Testament] revelation (Luke 24:25-27).
Christian preachers should make sure that they teach the same biblical theology as Jesus taught. His interpretation of the OT, and his summary of his own teaching is found in Luke 24:44-47: 'This is what I told you when I was still with you: Everything must be fulfilled that is written about me in the Law of Moses, the Prophets, and the Psalms...The Christ will suffer and rise from the dead on the third day, and repentance and forgiveness of sins will be preached in his name to all nations...' Jesus attempted to teach true biblical theology; that is, to interpret the OT as pointing to him."

P.J.H. Adams, "Preaching and biblical theology," from The New Dictionary of Biblical Theology.

Friday, August 24, 2012

A Plea for Diligent, Undistracted Pastors

2 Timothy 2:4 "No soldier gets entangled in civilian pursuits, since his aim is to please the one who enlisted him."

Richard Baxter, on the importance of a pastor giving himself wholly to the work of training and teaching of each member of his congregation:

"It will do good to many ministers, who are too apt to be idle, and to mis-pend their time in unnecessary discourse, business, journeys, or recreations. It will let them see that they have no time to spare for such things; and thus, when they are engaged in so much pressing employment of so high a nature, it will be the best cure for all that idleness, and loss of time. Besides, it will cut off that scandal, which usually [attends such idleness]; for people are apt to say, 'Such a minister can spend his time at [sporting events, or games], or [in] vain discourse; and why may not we do so as well as he?' Let us all set diligently to this part of our work, and then see what time we can find to spare to live idly, or in a way of voluptuousness, or worldliness, if we can."

May God grant me, and all involved in ministry, to do the work with all our might!

Thursday, August 16, 2012

The Message and the Method of the Cross


1 Corinthians 2:1–5 (ESV)
1And I, when I came to you, brothers, did not come proclaiming to you the testimony of God with lofty speech or wisdom.
2For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ and him crucified.
3And I was with you in weakness and in fear and much trembling,
4and my speech and my message were not in plausible words of wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power,
5so that your faith might not rest in the wisdom of men but in the power of God.

Here we see that not only was the cross at the center of Paul’s message, but it was also at the center of his method. That is, the cross not only determined what he said, but also how he said it.

And how did he, in fact, say it? Verse three tells us: “…in weakness and in fear and much trembling.” Astonishing! The Apostle Paul! The Mighty Apostle! The Great Missionary, Preacher, and Evangelist! In weakness and in fear?!? Surely not?!

Indeed. The apostle Paul was afraid. He trembled. He was weak. And this was his method of proclaiming the message of the cross. And God through this weakness worked mightily.

Just like at Calvary. On the cross, that symbol of helplessness, that “emblem of suff’ring and shame,” God’s might was unveiled most majestically and decisively. The ultimate contradiction: power through weakness. God’s chosen method to bring his salvation.

And also Paul’s chosen method to bring the message of salvation.

Surely we are confronted here with a convicting truth: Why, given God’s and Paul’s approach, do we set ourselves so earnestly upon the path of power and prestige as the method by which we will proclaim the message? Is it not, to reference Martin Luther (thanks Carl Trueman: http://www.reformation21.org/blog/2011/11/the-forgotten-insight.php) because we have a theology of the cross but are not ourselves theologians of the cross?

God help me and us to be such theologians.
 

Monday, August 13, 2012

Seminaries, Churches, and Spiritual Formation

I enjoyed tonight a series of posts dealing with the connections between the church, seminaries, and spiritual formation/development. You'll have to navigate a little bit to get to the first post, but this link will get you started: http://www.reformation21.org/blog/2012/08/seminaries-and-spiritual-forma.php

Saturday, August 11, 2012

David's strength and ours


As I prepare for ministry, I am struck by how often I am looking to the Lord for strength. Or to put it another way, I am struck by just how weak I am.

Thankfully, the Lord has much to say in his Word about “strength.” One particular place I have been turning to much lately is Psalm 18, where the opening verse reads: “I love you, O LORD, my strength.” In what sense did David mean that the LORD is his strength? There are three senses in which he means this.

1.     David recognized that all his talents, gifts, and strengths were from his LORD.

David was a mighty warrior, a great king. He won many victories through his prowess, even slaying his ten-thousands versus Saul’s mere thousands, as the local lyric went. But David recognized that anything he possessed by way of might- either of a military kind or of another- was from God. So he says in Psalm 18:32 that God is “the God who equipped me with strength.” God had indeed imparted to David- and has imparted to each of us- strengths and talents. It is not wrong to identify and use these, but we must do so in the knowledge that we did not gain them on our own, but were given them by the one who made us.

2.     David recognized that all his talents, gifts, and strengths were nothing apart from his LORD.

This is, as it were, the next step in acknowledging the Lord as your strength. Not only did David recognize that everything was from the LORD, he also knew that is was only by his God that he would be able to employ his strengths with any success. So, in 18:29, David declares, “by you I can run against a troop, and by my God I can leap over a wall. Notice, David did not say, “by the gifts and talents God has given me I can do this and that.” No! It was by God that he could do these things. All of our gifts and talents count for nothing unless energized and supported by the LORD who gave them to us.

3.     David recognized that all his talents, abilities, and strengths were not his LORD.

Finally, David understood that at some point it is not about his gifts or talents, even gifts and talents employed using God’s enablement. At some point, we are completely out of the picture, and our gifts are out of it with us. All that is left is the LORD himself. We see this in verses 4-19. The picture is not one in which David wins the victory by using the gifts God has given him in the strength that God supplies. Rather, the picture is one in which David is totally helpless and weak, with “the cords of death encompassed” about him. He is in deep “distress” and in need of being “rescued.” God alone can act in such a time, and indeed he does. Verses 6-15 record a rather terrifying- though somehow comforting- vision of God coming forth from his temple in furious might, a might bent in the direction of the destruction of David’s enemies, a might bent in the direction of the salvation of David himself. In those moments, David’s gifts and talents- even those empowered by God- would not suffice. Only David’s God himself could rescue. The LORD alone was his strength.

And, of course, where does this line of thought ultimately end, biblically-speaking? Surely it leads our eyes through biblical history to that ultimate demonstration of God’s strength and deliverance on our behalf: the cross of Jesus Christ. There our God did what we could not do, cannot do, and will never be able to do. There he won the victory for his people, apart from them completely- we helped him none at all. He alone suffered that day. He alone, “while we were still weak, at the right time…died for the ungodly.” Let us say together, then, as ones this side of Calvary, “I love you, Jesus, my strength.”

Sunday, August 5, 2012

Do we need the original languages?

I'm re-reading some portions of John Piper's Brothers, We Are Not Professionals. It's a solid assault on the professionalization of the pastoral office, one that I'm sure I will turn to again and again to beat back the temptations that seek to turn the ministry into mere management.

Of note today was Piper's chapter, "Brothers, Bitzer Was a Banker." In it, Piper makes a plea for pastors to become well-versed in the original languages of Scripture- Greek and Hebrew. He tells of a man named Heinrich Bitzer, who was ardently committed to knowing the original languages of the Bible. And the kicker was this: Bitzer was a banker. Not a pastor. Not an Old Testament professor. A banker. How much more, Piper contends, should pastors be committed to Greek and Hebrew, seeing as it is the nature of their office to expound the Word of God with accuracy and power!

Piper goes on, then, to show some of the reasons pastors need to know the original languages. I thought it perhaps helpful to give them here...

1. Without the original languages, "the confidence of pastors to determine the precise meaning of the Biblical text diminishes" (82).
2. "...the uncertainty of having to depend on differing translations- which always involve much interpretations- will tend to discourage careful textual analysis in sermon preparation" (82).
3. As a result of all of this, "[expository] preaching...falls into disuse and disfavor" (83).
4. "Another result when pastors do not study the Bible in Greek and Hebrew is that they, and their churches with them, tend to become second-handers. The harder it is for us to get at the original meaning of the Bible, the more we will revert to the secondary literature" (83).
5. "Weakness in Greek and Hebrew also gives rise to exegetical imprecision and carelesseness. And exegetical imprecision is the mother of liberal theology."
6. "...when we fail to stress the use of Greek and Hebrew as valuable in the pastoral office, we create an eldership of professional academicians" (84). By this Piper means that it is no longer pastors who are the masters of the Word, but only those outside the church, those in seminaries and universities.
7. As a result of number 7, then, Piper contends there results a "depreciation of the pastoral office" (84).
8. Finally, in quoting Martin Luther, Piper warns that "if we neglect the literature [i.e. the Scriptures in the original languages] we shall eventually lose the gospel" (87).

What think you? Is Piper off course? Are the original languages that necessary?

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Jesus our Life

Jesus compares his ministry at one point to a doctor working with the sick. It is really a wonderful illustration. But it only goes so far. You see, a doctor gives to his patients something outside of himself- some medicine or something- to make them well. But Jesus - he gives us himself. He himself is our cure, our life.

Tuesday, July 31, 2012

The Drama of Redemption

The Drama of Redemption in Ephesians 2:11-22

v. 11- The Main Characters: Jews ("the circumcision") and Gentiles ("the uncircumcision").

v. 12- The Conflict: Gentiles are "separated," "alienated," "strangers," "having no hope," and "without God in the world."

v. 13- The Turning Point: "...in Christ Jesus" the Gentiles "have been brought near."

vv. 14-18- The Twist: Jews and Gentiles "both one" in Christ.

vv. 19-20- The Resolution: Gentiles "no longer strangers and aliens," but are "fellow citizens." 

v. 21- The Climax: Jews and Gentiles in Christ together a "holy temple in the Lord"

v. 22- The Moral: "...you also"?

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Preaching Christ

"Him we proclaim...." Colossians 1:28

Christ was the continually spotlighted element in Paul's ministry. Even if we did not have an explicit  statement telling us this, as we do here in Colossians (see also 1 Corinthians 2:2; 2 Corinthians 4:5), we would still know it to be true from what is the general tone and content of his many sermons and epistles: Christ is simply everywhere.

But why is this so for him? The Bible is a very large book, much of it not explicitly mentioning our Lord. So why was Paul's life and ministry so explicitly "Christ-focused"?

The answer is this: because the Bible itself is "Christ-focused."

Christ is the centerpiece of all God's revelation. All of salvation history moves toward Christ, and all the parts find themselves tied together in him. The whole of the biblical plot-line (if we understand the big picture), features Jesus of Nazareth as its main character. Whether explicitly (as in the Gospels for example), or implicitly (as in the Prophets for instance), in God's divine redemptive drama, Christ has the lead role.

Tim Keller expresses this truth concisely and draws out the implications of it in such a way that I think Paul would heartily agree with:

"There are two ways to read the Bible. The one way to read the Bible is that it’s basically about you: what you have to do in order to be right with God, in which case you’ll never have a sure and certain hope, because you’ll always know you’re not quite living up. You’ll never be sure about that future. Or you can read it as all about Jesus. Every single thing is not about what you must do in order to make yourself right with God, but what he has done to make you absolutely right with God. And Jesus Christ is saying, “Unless you can read the Bible right, unless you can understand salvation by grace, you’ll never have a sure and certain hope. But once you understand it’s all about me, Jesus Christ, then you can know that you have peace. You can know that you have this future guaranteed, and you can face anything."

Sunday, July 22, 2012

So you think you're tough, eh?


Soon I will be making the transition from being a full-time delivery driver to a part-time church staff member. As I said yesterday, I am eager to take hold of this opportunity given me by my church, but I also possess some (I think) healthy fear: it is an awesome thing to minister in and among the flock of God, which he purchased with his own blood, and to stand before both the Almighty and before his people. It is also a difficult thing. Only a fool would think that to wage the good warfare against the world, the flesh, and the devil will take little effort, little time, and little suffering.

Because ministry is a difficult thing, then, it is no wonder that the Bible speaks often of the strength needed by the one ministering. We could turn to many places to see this, but the following three references found in First and Second Timothy are my favorite.

1.     1 Timothy 1:12
Here the emphasis is on Christ’s identity: literally, the Lord is “the one who has strengthened” Paul. In the context, the apostle is discussing his appointment to ministry. Not only, then, is Jesus the one who puts a person into ministry, he is also the one who empowers for it.  We learn in this verse, therefore, to see Christ as our strength in ministry.

2.     2 Timothy 2:1
Paul instructs Timothy in this verse to “be strengthened by the grace that is in Christ Jesus.” The emphasis is upon Christ as the source of power, in contrast to ourselves, who are weak. Reading on in verse 2 (and indeed in the whole epistle), we see that strength Paul is referring to is strength for Timothy to carry out his ministry. We learn here, then, to seek Christ for our strength.

3.     2 Timothy 4:17
Finally, in this verse Paul reflects upon the fact that Christ met his need for strength at a critical moment in ministry, helping him to persevere when it was most necessary. The emphasis is not so much on Christ’s identity, so much as on the fact that he was faithful to his identity in the given situation. Here, then, we learn to stand in Christ as our strength.

Saturday, July 21, 2012

New position

It is my tremendous joy to announce to anyone tuning in to my blog that beginning in September I will be taking a part-time staff position at Woodlands Church. I will be working with pastor John Jordens in the area of small groups and (hopefully) helping to develop a series of classes that will further the cause of adult Christian education in our congregation.
I cannot begin to express how grateful I am to my pastors and elders for giving me this opportunity to serve Christ and his body. I am filled with both eagerness and holy fear as I make this transition and will try earnestly to keep you updated on the progress of things.
Pray for me.
Grace be with you all.

Sunday, July 15, 2012

To pastor is to suffer

Richard Baxter, in his The Reformed Pastor, has the following to say about pastors who would avoid suffering by avoiding their duties. This is nothing short of a blaring alarm to not take the task of ministering lightly.

"...the common way of escaping suffering [is] to neglect the duty that would expose us to it. If we did our duty faithfully, ministers would find the same lot among professed Christians as their predecessors have done among Pagans and other infidels. But if you cannot suffer for Christ, why did you put your hand to his plough [sic]? Why did you not first sit down and count the cost? This makes the ministerial work so unfaithfully executed, because it is so carnally undertaken; men enter upon it as a life of ease, and honour [sic], and respectability, and they resolve to attain their ends, and have what they expected right or wrong. They looked not for hatred and suffering, and they will avoid it, though by avoiding of their work."

Thursday, July 5, 2012

First Sermon

Well, I have had a few busy weeks lately (hence my absence from blogging), partly as a result of needing to prepare the sermon I preached last Sunday at Community Church. I was blessed to be invited by Pastor Thomas to fill in for him and preached from Titus 2:11-14 on "Living in Light of the Gospel."

This was my first sermon in an actual local church setting. I've preached on occasion before this outside of a local congregation, but somehow this felt different. To bring the Word to God's people on the Lord's day seems more weighty than at other times. Perhaps I am mistaken on this, but nonetheless the event was significant for me and I trust it is a step along the path of the Lord's appointing.

Now for the nitty gritty, as they say. How did the sermon "go"?  Below is my attempt to self-assess my message (admittedly a dangerous task), including the good, the bad, and the ugly.

The Good
On several points, I'm not ashamed of my sermon from Sunday. First, as best as I knew how, I stuck to the text. To my knowledge, I didn't swerve to the right or to the left of the passage's meaning or the author's intent. Second, and related, as best as I knew how I maintained a "Gospel-centered" approach. Titus 2:11-14 of course makes this easy- Paul's focus is on how one's life ought to be lived in light of the Gospel- but nonetheless I tried to keep coming back to the Good News. Lastly (for now), I felt as though in general my "nerves" had little effect on my delivery.

The Bad
One thing that, were I able to do it again, I would change in my sermon relates to how I address my audience. Specifically, I would intentionally address unbelievers as unbelievers and press them with their need for Christ. Of course, there are good ways and bad ways to do this (it's annoying at best to hear the Gospel tacked on at the end of a sermon, totally disconnected from the message as a whole). Still, the bad apples ought not make us swear off fruit altogether. Another "bad" aspect of my message was the way in which I backed off on bringing in corroborating Scripture to bolster and refine my exposition. This was partly my fault, partly the result of restrictions imposed on my by my professor (as much as the message was for Community Church it also happened to work out that it filled a class requirement I have). Still, I feel as though this was a negative thing for me to do: in my future preaching I will aim at bringing in whatever texts I sense will help clarify the message and teach God's people his Word.

The Ugly
While in general my nerves didn't affect me, this is not to say they had zero impact on me- one of the sore spots of my sermon was the fact that I completely passed over a rather large portion of my message. No one in the congregation noticed, but I did (about half-way through), and it threw me a bit. On the upside, the part I blanked on was exactly the part I had told the Lord in prayer that morning, " Lord, I'm not so sure these parts fit." Perhaps the Lord thought the same thing and providentially helped me to "forget."Nonetheless, I learned a lesson. One more "ugly" thing in my judgment concerned my closing prayer. More and more I think it important to prepare for this portion of the sermon as much as for the rest. This is I'm sure more a matter of personal taste and what one is comfortable with, but for my own money I intend to no longer "wing it." Lastly, the only thing I can say is that it felt as though I had lead weights on every part of my body. My intention is never to be hyperactive in the pulpit, but still I hope to be dynamic and use my body to reinforce the message. I felt as though this was lacking.




Well, I'm sure there is more- much more- but for now these are some things I learned last weekend and will no doubt assist me in any future opportunities to preach the Lord will give me.

Saturday, June 23, 2012

Valley of Vision: Christlikeness

I love The Valley of Vision. Here is one of my favorites (Find it at http://www.banneroftruth.org/pages/dailydevotion_detail.php?3473).

Christlikeness

Father of Jesus,
Dawn returns, but without thy light within

           no outward light can profit;

Give me the saving lamp of thy Spirit that I may
     see thee,
   the God of my salvation, the delight of my soul,
   rejoicing over me in love.
I commend my heart to thy watchful care,
   for I know its treachery and power;
Guard its every portal from the wily enemy,
Give me quick discernment of his deadly arts,
Help me to recognize his bold disguise as an
     angel of light,
   and bid him begone.
May my words and works allure others to the
     highest walks of faith and love!
May loiterers be quickened to greater diligence
     by my example!
May worldlings be won to delight in acquaintance
     with thee!
May the timid and irresolute be warned
   of coming doom by my zeal for Jesus!
Cause me to be a mirror of thy grace,
   to show others the joy of thy service,
May my lips be well-tuned cymbals
   sounding thy praise,
Let a halo of heavenly-mindedness
      sparkle around me
   and a lamp of kindness sunbeam my path.
Teach me the happy art of
   attending to things temporal
   with a mind intent on things eternal.
Send me forth to have compassion
   on the ignorant and miserable.
Help me to walk as Jesus walked,
   my only Saviour and perfect model,
   his mind my inward guest,
   his meekness my covering garb.
Let my happy place be amongst the poor in spirit,
   my delight the gentle ranks of the meek.
Let me always esteem others better than myself,
   and find in true humility
   an heirdom to two worlds.

Saturday, June 16, 2012

Your preaching...stinks

My wife and I just returned last night from a long, though wonderful, week in Chicago. I was there taking a class on preaching at Moody Theological Seminary, along with ten other students all eager to serve the Lord in the ministry of the Word.

The highlight of the week was preaching on James 4:11-12 before my fellow students. While there is obviously stress involved in prepping for and delivering a message that will be evaluated by your peers (not to mention by your professor), the experience is overwhelmingly positive in nature and incredibly educational. In particular, the following "lessons" I found helpful, so helpful I thought I'd pass them along.

1. We preach before God.

It is a terrifying thing to know that every eye in the room is literally filling out an evaluation form as you preach. Everything about your sermon, from introduction to conclusion, exegesis to eye contact, your fellow students and teacher are giving you a score on. All of this equals one thing: pressure.
Ultimately, however, standing before your peers reminds you that one day you will stand before the Lord himself, who will ask us to give an account for each word we've ever uttered, every sermon we've ever preached. Surely this is the greater motivation for excellence in exposition. 

2. We preach before humans.

We preach before God. But we also preach before and to flesh and blood. One of the lessons I learned on this point was the importance of clarity in preaching. This applies not only to our words, but also to body language. Everything in the pulpit either helps clarify our message or obscure it. For instance, I learned of myself that I tend to both pace and tap the tips of my fingers together ("spider fingers") as I preach, something others found distracting. While painful to find out, such things are necessary to learn as I think about communicating the Word to others. Of course, we don't want to take this too far- some preachers are overly self-conscious of the way they are "coming off" to others. But this doesn't mean we don't strive for clarity in every sense.

3. We preach in real life.

I was tempted to think that since I would be away from work and home, preparing for my message would come easier for me than if I had been in my "normal" routine. But real life follows us everywhere. Driving an hour into the city each way, each day, through Chicago traffic proved exhausting. As did living out of a hotel room. Focus came hard. It was a good reminder that preaching never happens under sterile conditions- life is messy. Even on the very morning of my message, on the way into the city, my wife and I saw what appeared to be an awful motorcycle accident just outside our hotel. Any hope of concentrating after that was shot. But, in the end, God is gracious and gives all that is necessary to get his Word out.

4. We preach imperfectly.

My preaching, ultimately, stinks. Others may not think so (necessarily), but I know the truth. I know where I messed up, lost track, and didn't accurately communicate what I wanted to say. I further know that even if I had hit all my points perfectly according to plan, nothing I could have come up with could do justice to the glory of God's Word- I will always fall short of its purity. The treasure is indeed in clay pots, the message is uttered through faltering lips. And yet, God is pleased to use it. The wonder of all wonders is that the Lord condescends to work with such insufficient tools, and our words...in some inexplicable way...become his. How great a God we serve!